Legal Opinion

Wallace v. First Nat. Bank

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided March 27, 1934No. 21810PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Per curiam

Suit was commenced by the First National Bank of Kingston, Tenn., to recover on a check for $2,147.25 given by Achsa King Wallace to J. W. Stegall, upon which payment was stopped after it had been transferred to the plaintiff. The maker of the cheek having died, her administratrix, Maud Wallace, was substituted as defendant. By her answer the administratrix admitted the execution of the check, but alleged it was without consideration and was procured by fraud. The claim was duly filed with the administratrix, who refused payment.' The plaintiff introduced the check with Stegall’s indorsement…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Thomas v. ThomasSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1910
  2. Town of Canton v. MansfieldSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1925
  3. Welge v. ThompsonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1924

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Banning v. Peru-Laclede Syndicate, Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1937
  2. Caesar v. Phillips Petroleum Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1940
  3. Carter, Adm'r v. PinkertonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1944
  4. Lively v. DavisSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1966
  5. Sharp v. DunlapSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1936

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API