Legal Opinion
Sharp v. Dunlap
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided March 17, 1936No. 26699PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtMcNEILL, C. J.
This question involves a holder in due course of negotiable paper.
H. H. Sharp, plaintiff in error, also plaintiff in the trial court, instituted an action; against Ernest B. Dunlap to recover on two promissory notes payable to the Republic Life Insurance Company. Plaintiff alleged -he was the owner and holder of said notes for valuab e consideration and before maturity. Defendant admitted executing the notes, but alleged that the agent of said company made false statements and representations concerning the policy of insurance which he was purchasing and for which said notes were executed;…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Security Trust & Savings Bank of Charles City v. GleichmannSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915
- Conqueror Trust Co. v. Bayless Drug Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1919
- State v. EmerySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1918
- Wallace v. First Nat. BankSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1934
- City State Bank of Hobart v. PickardSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1912
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Citizens Bank, Booneville, Arkansas v. National Bank of Commerce, Tulsa, OklahomaCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1964
- James Talcott, Inc. v. FinleySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1964
- C. L. McMahon Jr. v. Caribbean Mills, Inc., a Haitian CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1964
- American Finance Corp. v. SpurginSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1938
- Caribbean Mills, Inc. v. McMahonDistrict Court, N.D. Oklahoma · 1963
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.