Legal Opinion

Town of Canton v. Mansfield

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided February 10, 1925No. 12082PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtClark, J.

This action was instituted by Jane Mansfield, defendant in error, plaintiff below, against the town of Canton, Blaine county, plaintiff in error, defendant below. Por -convenience the parties will he referred to as they appeared in the lower court.

Plaintiff brought said action to recover damages for personal injuries received while walking along one of the streets of said town of Canton. There whs a trial to a jury, and judgment for plaintiff in the sum of $500. Prom this judgment, the defendant appeals.

The propositions urged on appeal by the defendant, which require consideration, may 'be…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Ziska v. ZiskaSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1908
  2. Shawnee Light & Power Co. v. SearsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1908
  3. Singer v. Citizens' Bank of HeadrickSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1920

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Banning v. Peru-Laclede Syndicate, Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1937
  2. City of Ada v. BurrowSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1935
  3. City of Seminole v. MooringSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1939
  4. City of Lawton v. MorfordSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1930
  5. Wallace v. First Nat. BankSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1934

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API