Attorney Grievance Commission v. Christopher
Court of Appeals of Maryland
1Opinion of the Court
GREENE, Judge.
The Attorney Grievance Commission, acting through Bar Counsel, filed a petition for disciplinary action against Nathan H. Christopher, Jr. (Respondent) for violation of the Maryland Rule 16-812, Maryland Rules of Professional Conduct (MRPC). Bar Counsel also alleged that Respondent violated Maryland Rules 16-604 (Trust account — Required deposits),1 *62716-607 (Commingling of funds),2 and Maryland Code (1989, 1995 Repl.Vol.), § 10-306 of the Business and Occupation Article.3 With respect to the MRPC, the petition alleged that Respondent violated Rule 1.1 (Competence),4 1.3 (Diligenc*628e),…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Attorney Grievance Commission v. VanderlindeCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2001
- Attorney Grievance Commission v. AwuahCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1997
- Attorney Grievance Commission v. GoreCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2004
- Attorney Grievance Commission v. PostCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2003
- Attorney Grievance Commission v. KenneyCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1995
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by36 opinions
- Attorney Grievance Commission v. GuidaCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2006
- Attorney Grievance Commission v. CoppolaCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2011
- Attorney Grievance Commission v. TankoCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2009
- Attorney Grievance Commission v. FoltzCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2009
- Attorney Grievance Commission v. PalmerCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2010
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.