Legal Opinion

Attorney Grievance Commission v. Tanko

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided April 17, 2009No. Misc. AG No. 42, September Term, 2006PublishedCited by 45 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBell, C.J.

The Attorney Grievance Commission of Maryland, the petitioner, by Bar Counsel, acting pursuant to Maryland Rule 16-751, 1 filed a Petition For Disciplinary or Remedial Action against Louis P. Tanko, Jr., the respondent. The petition charged that the respondent violated Maryland Rules of Professional Conduct (“Rule” or “MRPC”) 1.1, Competence, 2 1.5, Fees, 3 1.6, Confidentiality of Information, 4 1.15, Safekeeping Property, 5 3.3, Candor Toward the Tribunal, 6 8.1, Bar Admis sion and Disciplinary Matters, 7 and 8.4, Misconduct, 8 as adopted by Maryland Rule 16-812, Maryland Rule 16-609,…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. Attorney Grievance Commission v. VanderlindeCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2001
  2. Attorney Grievance Commission v. GlennCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1996
  3. Attorney Grievance Commission v. AwuahCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1997
  4. Attorney Grievance Commission v. GuidaCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2006
  5. ATTORNEY GRIEV. COM'N OF MARYLAND v. MyersCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1994

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by45 opinions

  1. Attorney Grievance Commission v. BleeckerCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2010
  2. Attorney Grievance Commission v. CoppolaCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2011
  3. Attorney Grievance Commission v. HamiltonCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2015
  4. Attorney Grievance Commission v. McDonaldCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2014
  5. Attorney Grievance Commission v. GordonCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2010

40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API