Attorney Grievance Commission v. Coppola
Court of Appeals of Maryland
1Opinion of the Court
*374BATTAGLIA, J.
John Michael Coppola, Respondent, was admitted to the Bar of this Court on October 20,1997. On February 24, 2010, the Attorney Grievance Commission (“Petitioner” or “Bar Counsel”), acting pursuant to Maryland Rule 16-751(a),1 filed a “Petition for Disciplinary or Remedial Action” against Coppola, charging numerous violations of the Maryland Rules of Professional Conduct (“MRPC” or “Rule”), including Rule 1.2(d) (Scope of Representation),2 Rules 3.3(a)(1) and (a)(2) (Candor Toward the Tribunal),3 and Rules 8.4(a), (b), (c), and (d) (Misconduct),4 with regard to estate planning…
2Cases cited47 opinions
- In Re RuffaloSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Attorney Grievance Commission v. VanderlindeCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2001
- Attorney Grievance Commission v. GlennCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1996
- Attorney Grievance Commission v. GuidaCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2006
- Attorney Grievance Commission v. BleeckerCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2010
42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by56 opinions
- Attorney Grievance Commission v. HodesCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2014
- Attorney Grievance Commission v. AgbajeCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2014
- Attorney Grievance Commission v. Van NelsonCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2012
- Attorney Grievance Comm'n of Md. v. SperlingCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2018
- Attorney Grievance Commission of Maryland v. FrammCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2016
51 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.