Legal Opinion

Baer v. Armour Company

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided December 29, 1934No. File No. 7726PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWtAR'REN, J.

The plaintiff, as administratrix, brought action to recover for the alleged wrongful death of her husband, Max O. Baer, who died as the result of a collision between the car he was driving and a truck driven by E. E. Colby and owned by said Colby and one Verne Hull. The collision occurred at a point about six miles north of Hoven, in 'Walworth county, S. D. Baer was severely injured and died a short time thereafter.

Plaintiff contended upon trial of said action that Colby was engaged in trucking, hauling cream and empty cans, over a route mapped out by the defendant Armour & Co. That such a…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Mallinger v. Webster City Oil Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1929
  2. Badger Furniture Co. v. Industrial CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1929
  3. Biggins v. WagnerSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1932
  4. Showers v. LundNebraska Supreme Court · 1932
  5. Burns v. Eno.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1932

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Egemo v. FloresSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1991
  2. Smith Bros., Inc. v. O'BryanTexas Supreme Court · 1936
  3. Steen v. PottsSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1953
  4. Clausen v. Aberdeen Grain Inspection, Inc.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1999
  5. Dumire v. MartinSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1970

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API