Legal Opinion

Steen v. Potts

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided December 30, 1953No. File 9379PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSmith, J.

The plaintiff, Paul Steen, a contractor and builder, pursuant to conversations had with W. M. Potts, a lawyer, repaired three houses in Mobridge, South Dakota. When the work was completed Mr. Steen rendered a separate bill for each house for labor at the rate of $2.50 per hour, and materials at retail price. Mr. Potts paid- the amount claimed for the repair of one of the houses when the statement was rendered. Thereafter he ascertained that Mr. Steen had paid his help varying rates of from $1 to $1.75 per hour, and had received a contractor’s 10% discount on some of the materials supplied.…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Mallinger v. Webster City Oil Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1929
  2. Cockran v. RiceSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1910
  3. Stover Bedding Co. v. Industrial CommissionUtah Supreme Court · 1940
  4. Biggins v. WagnerSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1932
  5. Halverson v. Sonotone Corp.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1947

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Egemo v. FloresSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1991
  2. Larry Alexander v. Avera St. Luke's HospitalCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2014
  3. Goodman v. Sioux Steel Co.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1991
  4. Great West Casualty Co. v. BergesonSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1996
  5. In re Fedex Ground Package System, Inc.District Court, N.D. Indiana · 2008

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API