Legal Opinion

Showers v. Lund

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided April 8, 1932No. 28287PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGoss, C. J.

The compensation commissioner and the district court in turn denied compensation on the ground that plaintiff was not an employee but was an independent contractor. That is the only ground of this appeal.

Whether one is an employee or an independent contractor must be determined from the circumstances of each particular case. Potter v. Scotts Bluff County, 112 Neb. 318. “There is no hard and fast rule by which to determine whether one sustains the relation of employee *57or that of an independent contractor. It has frequently been held by this and other courts that the relation must be determined…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Bowen v. Gradison Construction CompanyCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1930
  2. Industrial Commission v. HammondSupreme Court of Colorado · 1925
  3. Industrial Commission v. BonfilsSupreme Court of Colorado · 1925
  4. Franklin Coal & Coke Co. v. Industrial CommissionIllinois Supreme Court · 1921
  5. Claus v. DeVereNebraska Supreme Court · 1931

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. United States v. SilkSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
  2. Riggins v. Lincoln Tent & Awning Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1943
  3. Bingaman v. Estate of BingamanNebraska Supreme Court · 1951
  4. Bailey's Bakery v. Tax CommissionerHawaii Supreme Court · 1948
  5. Standish v. Larsen-Merryweather Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1932

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API