Legal Opinion

Egemo v. Flores

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided May 15, 1991No. 17163PublishedCited by 60 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HERTZ, Acting Justice.

Dennis Egemo (Egemo) and St. Paul Fire & Marine Insurance Company appeal from a decision of the circuit court affirming the decision of the Department of Labor, Division of Labor and Management, Worker’s Compensation Division (Department) holding that Jose Flores (Flores) is an employee for the purposes of the Worker’s Compensation Act. On appeal, Egemo contends that Flores was actually an independent contractor, not an employee, and that Department and circuit court erred by considering the purpose of the worker’s compensation statutes in reaching their decisions. We…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Permann v. South Dakota Department of Labor, Unemployment Insurance DivisionSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1987
  2. In Re the Termination of the Franchise Agreement Between Groseth International, Inc.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1989
  3. Lawler v. Windmill RestaurantSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1989
  4. Cockran v. RiceSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1910
  5. In Re the Appeal of Hendrickson's Health Care ServiceSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1990

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by60 opinions

  1. Sopko v. C & R Transfer Co., Inc.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1998
  2. Caldwell v. John Morrell & Co.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1992
  3. Schuck v. John Morrell & Co.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1995
  4. Helms v. Lynn's, Inc.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1996
  5. Wagaman v. Sioux Falls ConstructionSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1998

55 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API