Legal Opinion

Dumire v. Martin

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided February 3, 1970No. File 10679PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HOMEYER, Judge.

The Industrial Commissioner denied the claim of Gordon Dumire for workmen's compensation benefits because he was an independent contractor and not an employee of the insureds when the injury was sustained. On appeal to the circuit court the Industrial Commissioner was affirmed. The claimant has appealed to this court.

There is little dispute in the facts. Dumire formerly farmed near Aberdeen in Brown County, South Dakota. He sold his farm and moved to Custer, South Dakota, about April 1, 1967. The insureds, E. Paul Martin and Harold D. Lang, 1 operated a sawmill in Custer and in…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Industrial Indemnity Exchange v. SouthardTexas Supreme Court · 1942
  2. Cockran v. RiceSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1910
  3. Schlichting v. RadkeSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1940
  4. Steen v. PottsSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1953
  5. Halverson v. Sonotone Corp.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1947

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Egemo v. FloresSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1991
  2. Davis v. FrizzellSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1993
  3. Moritz v. C & R TRANSFER CO.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1978
  4. Jeitz v. FlemingSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1974
  5. Black Hills Adventure Lodging, LLC v. Dlr, Reemployment Assistance DivisionSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2025

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API