Legal Opinion

Garcia v. Superior Court

California Court of Appeal

Decided May 26, 1941No. Civ. 2655PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMarks, J.

This is a proceeding in mandamus instituted in this court to compel respondents to bring in other parties by way of cross-complaint in an action brought against petitioner by the county of San Bernardino.

Margaret Garcia was an aged widow, a resident of San Bernardino, and was without means of support. She had four children; petitioner, Lewis V. Garcia, a son; Margaret Garcia, Mrs. Helen Gorman and Mrs. Florestine Stalheber, her adult daughters, all residents of California.

Mrs. Garcia had been granted aid under the provisions of the Welfare and Institutions Code and was receiving $24.20 per…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Shea v. City of San BernardinoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1936
  2. Adams v. White Bus LineCalifornia Supreme Court · 1921
  3. County of Los Angeles v. HurlbutCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1941
  4. County of Tulare v. County of KingsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1897
  5. Tucker v. NicholsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1938

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Huff v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1983
  2. Maricopa County v. DouglasArizona Supreme Court · 1949
  3. County of San Bernardino v. SimmonsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1956
  4. Swoap v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1973
  5. County of San Mateo v. BossCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API