Legal Opinion
County of San Mateo v. Boss
California Supreme Court
Decided January 27, 1971No. S.F. 22769PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
SULLIVAN, J.
In this case we are called upon to determine whether an adult child of a recipient of aid to the aged under the Old Age Security Law (Welf. & Inst. Code, div. 9, pt. 1, ch. 3, § 12000 et seq.) 1 may constitutionally be required to reimburse the state.
Plaintiff County of San Mateo (County) brought this action pursuant to sections 12100 and 12101 to collect from defendant accrued but unpaid monthly contributions of $20 each toward the support of his mother and to obtain an order requiring defendant to make such monthly contributions in the future. The case was tried without a…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- In Re Ricky H.California Supreme Court · 1970
- Department of Mental Hygiene v. KirchnerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1965
- Department of Mental Hygiene v. KirchnerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1964
- Department of Mental Hygiene of Cal. v. KirchnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- County of Los Angeles v. La FuenteCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- County of Alameda v. CarlesonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
- Hospital Services, Inc. v. BrooksNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1975
- Swoap v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1973
- Vincent v. State of CaliforniaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1971
- Hospital Services, Inc. v. BrooksNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1975
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.