County of Tulare v. County of Kings
California Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of Fresno County. Stanton L. Carter, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the Court
Chipman, C.
This is an action brought by plaintiff against defendant to enforce a claim for a portion of the bonded debt of plaintiff. The complaint alleges: That by act of the legislature (Stats. 1875-76, p. 26) plaintiff was authorized to issue and did issue $75,000 of bonds to build a courthouse, and by another act (Stats. 1877-78, p. 198) was authorized to issue and did issue road bonds to the amount of $31,000; that by act of the legislature (Stats. 1893, p. 176) the county of Kings (defendant) was created wholly out of Tulare county (plaintiff), and was fully established May 29, 1893;…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Commissioners of Laramie County v. COMMISSIONERS OF ALBANY COUNTYSupreme Court of the United States · 1876
- Hughes v. EwingCalifornia Supreme Court · 1892
- Bates v. GregoryCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
- County of Los Angeles v. County of OrangeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893
- County of Orange v. County of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896
3Cited by18 opinions
- Hopping v. Council of City of RichmondCalifornia Supreme Court · 1915
- City of San Francisco v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1920
- County of San Diego v. State of CaliforniaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2008
- Reclamation District No. 1500 v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1916
- Wheeler v. HerbertCalifornia Supreme Court · 1907
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.