Riggs v. Hot Springs
Supreme Court of Arkansas
1Opinion of the CourtButler, J.
The appellant was .tried before the circuit court of Garland County sitting as a jury, charged with having violated the occupation tax ordinance of the city of Hot Springs, by failing to pay an occupation tax under item No. 213 of the city ordinance, which item is as follows: “Item 213. Patent Medicine Companies: Meaning those persons or companies that manufacture patent medicines, or agents for patent medicines, $100.”
The entire ordinance, which is very lengthy and deals with all of the occupations engaged in the city of Hot Springs, in addition to the item first mentioned, provided that…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Painter v. PainterOhio Supreme Court · 1849
- William Hoefling & Son v. City of San AntonioTexas Supreme Court · 1892
- Jacobs v. BeechamSupreme Court of the United States · 1911
- State v. DonaldsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1889
- Chattanooga Plow Co. v. HaysTennessee Supreme Court · 1911
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Arkansas Beverage Company v. HeathSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1975
- Pledger v. Noritsu America Corp.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1995
- People v. HeronCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1939
- City of Austin v. DeatsCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1930
- People v. HeronAppellate Division of the Superior Court of California · 1939
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.