Legal Opinion

William Hoefling & Son v. City of San Antonio

Texas Supreme Court

Decided June 10, 1892No. 8290PublishedCited by 61 opinions

Appeal from Bexar. Tried below before Hon. W. W. King.

1Opinion of the Court

STAYTON, Chief Justice.

This case originated in the Justice Court, and on appeal to the District Court judgment was rendered against appellants upon the following agreed case:

“ 1. That plaintiffs, William Hoefling, Sr., and William Hoefling, Jr., are and were partners in business under the firm name of William Hoefling & Son, doing business as butchers in the city of San Antonio, Bexar County, Texas, at two separate establishments or private markets, upon their own property, and not in the market house of the city of San Antonio.
“ 2. That said plaintiffs opened said private markets upon their…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Hirshfield v. City of DallasCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1890

3Cited by61 opinions

  1. Hurt v. CooperTexas Supreme Court · 1937
  2. Brown v. City of GalvestonTexas Supreme Court · 1903
  3. Greene v. City of San AntonioCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1915
  4. City of Houston v. Harris County Outdoor Advertising Ass'nCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1994
  5. Huston v. City of Des MoinesSupreme Court of Iowa · 1916

56 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API