Legal Opinion

Chattanooga Plow Co. v. Hays

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided September 15, 1911PublishedCited by 43 opinions

PROM HAMILTON.' Appeal from the Chancery Court of Hamilton County.— T. M. McConnell, Chancellor.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Lansden

The question for decision in this case is -whether the Chattanooga Plow Company, a Tennessee corporation, and a manufacturer of plows, cane mills, and other agricultural implements, is a dealer or merchant, within the meaning of our revenue statute, so as to he liable for a merchant’s tax. The complainan t is taxed as a manufacturer, and has paid all taxes assessed against it as such. Its business extends all over the Avorld, and far more of its goods are exported to foreign lands, or shipped to other States of the United States, than are used or sold within the State of Tennessee. Less than…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. United States v. Cerecedo Hermanos Y CompañiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1908
  2. Crenshaw v. MooreTennessee Supreme Court · 1911
  3. Union Insurance v. HogeSupreme Court of the United States · 1859
  4. English v. CrenshawTennessee Supreme Court · 1908
  5. J. W. Kelly & Co. v. StateTennessee Supreme Court · 1910

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by43 opinions

  1. Cumberland Lodge, No. 8, Free & Accepted Masons v. Mayor of NashvilleTennessee Supreme Court · 1912
  2. Gallagher v. ButlerTennessee Supreme Court · 1964
  3. New England Mut. Life Ins. v. ReeceTennessee Supreme Court · 1935
  4. Moto-Pep, Inc. v. McGoldrickTennessee Supreme Court · 1957
  5. General Motors Corp. v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971

38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API