Legal Opinion
People v. Heron
Appellate Division of the Superior Court of California
Decided April 28, 1939No. Cr. A. No. 1569PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtBishop, J.
Appellant was convicted and sentenced on the charge that he, not being a registered pharmacist or assistant pharmacist, had sold a drug, to wit, eucalyptus oil. Of the truth of the charge there is no question; admittedly, the appellant sold a bottle of eucalyptus oil, which was a drug, and he was neither a registered pharmacist nor a registered assistant pharmacist. The provisions of section 4030 of our Business and Professions Code were thus plainly violated unless the article sold falls within the saving words of section 4032 of the same code. These two sections, both found in chapter 9 of…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Noel v. PeopleIllinois Supreme Court · 1900
- State v. DonaldsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1889
- People v. FowlerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1938
- People v. SilvaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1924
- State v. ChildsArizona Supreme Court · 1927
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- White v. State Board of PharmacyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1955
- Loblaw, Inc. v. New York State Board of PharmacyNew York Court of Appeals · 1962
- Loblaw, Inc. v. New York State Board of PharmacyNew York Supreme Court · 1960
- Loblaw, Inc. v. New York State Board of PharmacyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1961