State v. Donaldson
Supreme Court of Minnesota
These are two actions brought in the municipal court of Minneapolis, in each of which the plaintiff seeks to recover $100 from defendants for alleged violation of Laws 1885, c. 147, — the act to regulate the practice of pharmacy. The following facts are admitted in the pleadings: The defendants keep a large retail department store at the corner of Nicollet avenue and Sixth street, and not more than one mile from a drug or apothecary shop.
Read the full summary
These are two actions brought in the municipal court of Minneapolis, in each of which the plaintiff seeks to recover $100 from defendants for alleged violation of Laws 1885, c. 147, — the act to regulate the practice of pharmacy. The following facts are admitted in the pleadings: The defendants keep a large retail department store at the corner of Nicollet avenue and Sixth street, and not more than one mile from a drug or apothecary shop. They sell dry goods, notions, and toilet articles, (including soaps, perfumes, etc.,) such as are usually kept for sale by druggists, and patent and…
1Opinion of the CourtMitchell, J.
Most of the questions raised on these appeals are common to both, and hence the two may be considered together. The facts are correctly and fully set out in the statements prefixed to appellants’ briefs, except that iLshould be added that the preparation called “Beef, Iron, and Wine,” is not a “patent” or “proprietary” medicine, and that it has no other use but medicinal. The questions involved are the construction and validity of chapter 147, Laws 1885, entitled “An act to regulate the practice of pharmacy, the licensing of persons to carry on such practice, and the sale of poisons in the…
2Cited by45 opinions
- Noel v. PeopleIllinois Supreme Court · 1900
- Rippe v. BeckerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1894
- In Re the Cities of Annandale & Maple Lake NPDES/SDS Permit Issuance for the Discharge of Treated WastewaterSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2007
- State ex rel. Board of Education v. BrownSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1906
- Low v. Rees Printing Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1894
40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.