Legal Opinion

People v. Heron

California Court of Appeal

Decided April 28, 1939PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

34 Cal.App.2d Supp. 755 (1939)

THE PEOPLE, Respondent,

v.

N. C. HERON, Appellant.

California Court of Appeals.

April 28, 1939.

Edward J. Cotter for Appellant. [34 Cal.App.2d Supp. 757]

Ray L. Chesebro, City Attorney, W. Jos. McFarland, Assistant City Attorney, and John L. Bland, Deputy City Attorney, for Respondent.

Bishop, J.

Appellant was convicted and sentenced on the charge that he, not being a registered pharmacist or assistant pharmacist, had sold a drug, to wit, eucalyptus oil. Of the truth of the charge there is no question; admittedly, the appellant sold a bottle of eucalyptus oil, which was…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Noel v. PeopleIllinois Supreme Court · 1900
  2. State v. DonaldsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1889
  3. People v. FowlerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1938
  4. People v. SilvaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1924
  5. State v. ChildsArizona Supreme Court · 1927

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. People v. PallaresAppellate Division of the Superior Court of California · 1952
  2. People v. PallaresCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1952
  3. Proprietary Ass'n v. Bd. of Pharmacy of NJSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1954
  4. People v. TilkinCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1939
  5. State v. Red Owl Stores, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1962

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API