Legal Opinion

Foulk v. Hampton

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided January 13, 1930No. Appeal, 104PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Simpson,

Defendant, who was the general contractor for the erection and construction of a public school, entered into a subcontract with plaintiffs for them to supply certain of the materials and do certain of the work required by the general contract. By agreement of the parties, a referee was selected to try the present suit, brought on the subcontract; he filed a report, which was referred back because of an error of law which affected his award; a second report was likewise sent back for the same reason; and his third report, finding in favor of plaintiffs, as the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Robb v. StoneSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1929
  2. Clarkson v. CrawfordSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1926
  3. Kohn v. BurkeSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1928
  4. Commonwealth, to Use v. CrowSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1928
  5. Plymouth Cordage Co. v. Pennsylvania Wood Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1902

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Kolich v. Monongahela Railway Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1931
  2. Gordon v. Hartford Sterling Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1935
  3. Mathues's EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1936
  4. Schline v. KineSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1930
  5. Lincoln Deposit & Trust Co. v. SankerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1931

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API