Legal Opinion

Mathues's Estate

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided May 13, 1936No. Appeal, 220PublishedCited by 28 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Chief Justice Kephart,

The Act of June 7, 1917, P. L. 447, Sec. 53, empowers the Orphans’ Court to remove a fiduciary over whom it exercises jurisdiction upon cause shown. The removal of a trustee is a drastic action, which should only be taken when the estate is actually endangered and intervention is necessary to save trust property. In Neafie’s Estate, 199 Pa. 307, it was stated there must be a substantial reason before the court will remove a trustee, who enjoyed the confidence of the person who created the trust. A testator has, as a property right, the privilege and power…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Neafie's EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1901
  2. Eberly's AppealSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1885
  3. Estate of HowellSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1897
  4. Marsden's EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1895
  5. Foulk v. HamptonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1930

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by28 opinions

  1. Trust Agrmt. of E. Taylor Appeal of: Wells FargoSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2017
  2. Crawford's EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1940
  3. In Re Francis Edward McGillick FoundationSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1994
  4. Fraiman EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1962
  5. Wormley EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1948

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API