Plymouth Cordage Co. v. Pennsylvania Wood Co.
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Appeal, No. 403, Jan. T., 1901, by defendant, from order of C. P. No. 3, Phila. Co., Dec. T., 1899, No. 477, dismissing exceptions to report of referee in case of Plymouth Cordage Company v. Pennsylvania Wood Company. Exceptions to report of George Wharton Pepper, Esq., referee. The appellant’s book contained the following “ Statement of Question Involved.”
Read the full summary
Appeal, No. 403, Jan. T., 1901, by defendant, from order of C. P. No. 3, Phila. Co., Dec. T., 1899, No. 477, dismissing exceptions to report of referee in case of Plymouth Cordage Company v. Pennsylvania Wood Company. Exceptions to report of George Wharton Pepper, Esq., referee. The appellant’s book contained the following “ Statement of Question Involved.” The plaintiff alleged that its contract was “ if the defendant would procure from the plaintiff all the twine necessary for its use, the plaintiff would fill the defendant’s orders at the lowest market prices, giving to the defendant every…
1Opinion of the Court
Per Curiam,
The judgment in this case must be sustained, unless we dis*208turb findings of fact confirmed by tbe court below. This we are unwilling to do, not having been persuaded that there is error in any of the findings or conclusions of the careful and learned referee.
The second and fourth specific findings were:
“ In a conversation had between the agents of the plaintiff and the defendant, in September, 1896, the plaintiff’s representative stated, in substance, to the defendant’s representative that the defendant, buying from the plaintiff twine in carload lots for current needs, would be…
2Cited by1 opinion
- Foulk v. HamptonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1930