Legal Opinion

Lincoln Deposit & Trust Co. v. Sanker

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided November 25, 1931No. Appeal, 58PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Schaffer,

Appellants (defendants) seek to escape from an obligation which they assumed to plaintiff upon grounds singularly lacking in merit when the facts connected with the transactions between them and appellee are taken into account.

On July 19, 1924, the Young Men’s Institute Home Association, Inc., of Altoona, borrowed from plaintiff f10,000, to be used in the construction of a building. To enable it to procure the loan, defendants and two others endorsed the note given for it and guaranteed payment thereof. On October 18, 1924, a renewal note of similar amount was…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Citizens' Bk. of Wind Gap v. LipschitzSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1929
  2. Schline v. KineSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1930
  3. Foulk v. HamptonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1930
  4. Simpson's v. BovardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1874
  5. Massey v. MasseySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1920

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Aliquippa National Bank v. HarveySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1940
  2. Swaney v. Georges Township Road DistrictSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1932
  3. Grange Nat. Bank, Etc. v. CollmanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1931
  4. Hershberger v. HershbergerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1942
  5. Republic National Bank of Dallas v. StrealyTexas Supreme Court · 1961

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API