Legal Opinion

Commonwealth, to Use v. Crow

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided September 28, 1928No. Appeal, 138PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Simpson,

Defendant agreed to buy from use-plaintiff, the appellant here, a tract of land, paid part of the purchase price therefor, entered into immediate possession of it, erected a building and made a number of other permanent improvements on it, and began mining coal from an open mine on the property. It appearing that the Freeport vein of coal, which was supposed to run through the tract, had been previously conveyed to a third party, defendant claimed that a deduction should be made from the balance of the purchase price. Negotiations for a settlement having failed,…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Commonwealth ex rel. Lafean v. SnyderSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1918
  2. Hibert v. LangSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1895
  3. Craighead v. SwartzSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1907
  4. Glennon v. Lebanon Mfg. Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1891
  5. Kille v. EgeSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1876

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Nick v. CraigSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1930
  2. Abrahams, Adrx. v. Wilson, MayorSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1938
  3. Snyder EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1943
  4. Foulk v. HamptonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1930
  5. Moyer v. Blue Mountain Electric Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1928

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API