Lovett v. Bell
California Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtSpence, J.
This is an appeal by defendants from a judgment of eviction and damages for withholding entered in an unlawful detainer action brought after the expiration of the lease between the parties litigant. The Price Administrator has filed a brief as amicus curiae in support of defendants’ claim that the judgment must be reversed because it contravenes the Emergency Price Control Act of 1942, as amended (56 Stats. 23, 50 U.S.C.A., App., § 901 et seq.) and the Rent Regulation for Housing (8 P.R. 7322) promulgated thereunder. The record sustains that position.
There is no dispute as to the facts.…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Brooklyn Savings Bank v. O'NeilSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- D. A. Schulte, Inc. v. GangiSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
- Case v. BowlesSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
- Miller v. Mun. Court of L. A.California Supreme Court · 1943
- Porter v. LeeSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Barkett v. BrucatoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1953
- Gross v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1985
- G. C. Breidert Co. v. Sheet Metal Workers International Ass'nCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1956
- Levitt v. Glen L. Clark & Co.California Court of Appeal · 1949
- Moss v. WilliamsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1948
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.