Legal Opinion
Porter v. Lee
Supreme Court of the United States
Decided May 27, 1946No. 1116 and 1117PublishedCited by 102 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Black
October 24,1944, Dr. Lee brought a forcible detainer suit in the Justice of the Peace Court of Kenton County, Kentucky, to recover possession of an apartment he had rented to R. C. and Sarah Beever by reason of an alleged nonpayment of rent due on October 18, 1944. On December 4, 1944, before any judgment had been rendered, the Price Administrator, under § 205 of the Emergency Price Control Act, 56 Stat. 23, sought an injunction in the Federal District Court to order respondents, Dr. and Mrs. Lee, not to prosecute eviction proceedings against “Beever or any other tenant” and to restrain them…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Hecht Co. v. BowlesSupreme Court of the United States · 1944
- Bowles v. WillinghamSupreme Court of the United States · 1944
- Texas & New Orleans Railroad v. Northside Belt Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1928
- Henderson v. FleckingerCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1943
- Bowles v. LeeDistrict Court, E.D. Kentucky · 1945
3Cited by102 opinions
- Porter v. Warner Holding Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1946
- Matricia Moore v. Consolidated Edison Company of New York, Inc. And John MorrillCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2005
- Schrier v. University of ColoradoCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2005
- Fleming v. RhodesSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Darnell GARCIA, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. John C. LAWN, D.E.A. Administrator, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
97 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.