Legal Opinion

Levitt v. Glen L. Clark & Co.

California Court of Appeal

Decided May 4, 1949No. Civ. 16846PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMoore, P. J.

From a judgment against the corporate defendant only it has appealed on the ground that the contract of the parties violated master price regulation No. 445, promulgated pursuant to the federal Emergency Price Control Act of 1942 [56 Stats. 23, 50 U.S.C.A.App. § 901 et seq.]

In January, 1945, respondent agreed to procure for appellant the right to purchase specific brands of whisky from agents of a Canadian distillery for which service respondent was to receive a commission of 50 cents for each case of such liquor thereafter delivered to appellant.

Subsequently, appellant paid respondent 50…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Grimes v. NicholsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1945
  2. Heesy v. VaughnCalifornia Supreme Court · 1948
  3. Lovett v. BellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1947
  4. Gelb v. BenjaminCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1947
  5. Title Insurance & Trust Co. v. GrahamCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1941

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Barkett v. BrucatoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1953
  2. Agran v. ShapiroCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1954
  3. Phalanx Air Freight, Inc. v. National Skyway Freight Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1951
  4. Brummund v. City of OaklandCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1952
  5. Johnson v. HapkeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1960

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API