Legal Opinion

Moss v. Williams

California Court of Appeal

Decided April 13, 1948No. Civ. 15941PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWood, J.

In this action in unlawful detainer, plaintiff obtained judgment for possession of the premises and for treble damages in the sum of $945. Plaintiff’s motion for judgment on- the pleadings, as to the issue of possession, was granted. Testimony was received upon the issue of damages. Defendant Williams appeals from the judgment.

Plaintiff commenced the action without having complied with the Emergency Price Control Act of 1942 [56 Stats. 23; 50 U.S.C.A. App., §901 et seq.], as amended, and the Rent Regulation for Housing prescribed by the- Office of Price Administration under authority of that…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Lovett v. BellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1947
  2. Wells Fargo Bank & Union Trust Co. v. BroadCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1934
  3. Bowles v. StranoDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1945
  4. Montano v. KimmelNew York Supreme Court · 1945

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. In Re SCCC Associates II Ltd. PartnershipUnited States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. California · 1993
  2. Johnson v. R. S. Const. Co.District Court, D. Maryland · 1948
  3. Uren v. TroupCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1952
  4. Owens v. City and County of San Francisco CA1/4California Court of Appeal · 2021

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API