Legal Opinion

Roth v. First Security Bank of Rock Springs

Wyoming Supreme Court

Decided July 18, 1984No. 83-193PublishedCited by 66 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CARDINE, Justice.

Appellant, in a third-party action, sought to recover damages resulting from a claimed wrongful refusal by appellees to grant a construction loan. This appeal is from a summary judgment in favor of third-party defendants First Security Bank of Rock Springs, George Stahla, and Keith West. We will affirm.

In December of 1981 James Roth, West-gate Investments and Adams Sales, Inc. (referred to herein as Roth) began negotiations for a loan with First Security Bank of Rock Springs. From December of 1981 until July of 1982, Roth and George Stahla, the bank’s loan officer, discussed…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Johnson v. SoulisWyoming Supreme Court · 1975
  2. Reno Livestock Corp. v. Sun Oil Co.(Delaware)Wyoming Supreme Court · 1981
  3. Weaver v. Blue Cross-Blue ShieldWyoming Supreme Court · 1980
  4. Bancroft v. JaguschWyoming Supreme Court · 1980
  5. Blackmore v. Davis Oil Co.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1983

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by66 opinions

  1. Hatfield v. Board Of County Commissioners For Converse CountyCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1995
  2. Prenalta Corp. v. Colorado Interstate Gas Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1991
  3. Duffy v. BrownWyoming Supreme Court · 1985
  4. Birt v. Wells Fargo Home Mortgage, Inc.Wyoming Supreme Court · 2003
  5. Zimmerman v. First Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n of Rapid City, S.D.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1988

61 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API