Legal Opinion

Akpik v. State, Office of Management & Budget

Alaska Supreme Court

Decided June 24, 2005No. S-11078PublishedCited by 41 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

BRYNER, Chief Justice.

I. INTRODUCTION

Joseph Akpik, Lydia Sovalik, Joeb Woods, and Abraham Woods (collectively “Akpik”) are landowners on the North Slope, near the village of Nuiqsut. Phillips Alaska requested that the Alaska Division of Governmental Coordination determine whether a proposed exploratory drilling project near Nuiqsut was consistent with the Alaska Coastal Management Program. The division gave public notice that it would accept comments regarding Phillips’s proposed drilling project. Akpik attempted to submit comments after the deadline for comments passed; the division…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Moore v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1976
  2. Fairbanks Fire Fighters Ass'n, Local 1324 v. City of FairbanksAlaska Supreme Court · 2002
  3. Kodiak Seafood Processors Ass'n v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1995
  4. Ulmer v. Alaska Restaurant & Beverage Ass'nAlaska Supreme Court · 2001
  5. Hayes v. CharneyAlaska Supreme Court · 1985

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by41 opinions

  1. Wetherhorn v. Alaska Psychiatric InstituteAlaska Supreme Court · 2007
  2. In Re Hospitalization of Naomi B.Alaska Supreme Court · 2019
  3. GILBERT M. v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 2006
  4. Peter v. State, Department of Health & Social ServicesAlaska Supreme Court · 2006
  5. Harvey v. CookAlaska Supreme Court · 2007

36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API