Legal Opinion

Wetherhorn v. Alaska Psychiatric Institute

Alaska Supreme Court

Decided April 13, 2007No. S-11939PublishedCited by 67 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

FABE, Justice.

I. INTRODUCTION

Roslyn Wetherhorn appeals two superior court orders: one approving her involuntary commitment for thirty days and the other approving the non-consensual administration of psychotropic medication. Wetherhorn challenges the constitutionality of the statute relied on by the court to order her involuntary commitment. She also raises due process and evidentiary challenges to both orders. We conclude that the commitment statute is constitutional if construed to require a level of incapacity so substantial that the respondent cannot survive safely in freedom. But…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. Mullane v. Central Hanover Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
  2. Addington v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  3. Kansas v. HendricksSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
  4. Foucha v. LouisianaSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  5. O'Connor v. DonaldsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1975

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by67 opinions

  1. Bigley v. Alaska Psychiatric InstituteAlaska Supreme Court · 2009
  2. Sowinski v. WalkerAlaska Supreme Court · 2008
  3. In Re the Necessity for the Hospitalization of Joan K.Alaska Supreme Court · 2012
  4. In Re Hospitalization of Naomi B.Alaska Supreme Court · 2019
  5. In Re the Necessity for the Hospitalization of Jacob S.Alaska Supreme Court · 2016

62 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API