Legal Opinion

Peter v. State, Department of Health & Social Services

Alaska Supreme Court

Decided November 9, 2006No. S-12119PublishedCited by 33 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

EASTAUGH, Justice.

I. INTRODUCTION

The superior court adjudicated Peter A.'s two children to be children in need of aid (CINA) under AS 47.10.011(6), (9), and (10) after his wife developed an alcohol abuse problem. Peter appeals the adjudication order. He argues that the superior court erred by adjudicating the children to be in need of aid based solely on his wife's conduct, despite his ability and willingness to care for the children. He also argues that the adjudication violates his constitutional right to parent his children and the Indian Child Welfare Act. 1 Because the superior…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. United States v. Munsingwear, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
  2. U.S. Bancorp Mortgage Co. v. Bonner Mall PartnershipSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  3. Daniel DILLEY, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Bryan S. GUNN, Warden; Norma Wells; Sgt. Butler; B. Schelke, Defendants-AppellantsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1995
  4. Graham v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1981
  5. Fairbanks Fire Fighters Ass'n, Local 1324 v. City of FairbanksAlaska Supreme Court · 2002

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by33 opinions

  1. Jacob v. State, Department of Health & Social Services, Office of Children's ServicesAlaska Supreme Court · 2008
  2. In Re the Necessity for the Hospitalization of Joan K.Alaska Supreme Court · 2012
  3. In Re Hospitalization of Naomi B.Alaska Supreme Court · 2019
  4. Wells v. BarileAlaska Supreme Court · 2015
  5. In Re the Necessity for the Hospitalization of Mark V.Alaska Supreme Court · 2014

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API