Lauer v. Pierce County
Washington Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtOwens, J.
¶1 Louise Lauer and Darrell de Tienne separately own properties that neighbor a lot owned by Mike and Shima Garrison. Through a Land Use Petition Act (LUPA) petition, chapter 36.70C RCW, Lauer and de Tienne challenge a fish and wildlife variance granted to the Garrisons by Pierce County (the County) to build a single family residence within the protective buffer zone of a stream that runs across the Garrisons’ property. The central issue before us is whether the Garrisons’ rights vested in 2004 when they submitted their building application. The Garrisons also raise questions about the…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- In re the Personal Restraint of IsadoreWashington Supreme Court · 2004
- In Re IsadoreWashington Supreme Court · 2004
- HJS Development, Inc. v. Pierce CountyWashington Supreme Court · 2003
- Citizens for Mount Vernon v. City of Mount VernonWashington Supreme Court · 1997
- Citizens for Mount Vernon v. Mount VernonWashington Supreme Court · 1997
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Lakey v. Puget Sound Energy, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 2013
- Town of Woodway v. Snohomish CountyWashington Supreme Court · 2014
- State v. CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEYCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2012
- Klineburger v. King CountyCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2015
- Snohomish County v. Pollution Control Hearings BoardWashington Supreme Court · 2016
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.