Legal Opinion
Klineburger v. King County
Court of Appeals of Washington
Decided August 3, 2015No. 71325-6-IPublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
¶1
Leach, J.
This appeal involves the scope of the superior court’s appellate review under the Land Use Petition Act (LUPA), chapter 36.70C RCW. King County (County) and the Department of Ecology appeal the trial court’s order in this LUPA action. Stephen and Sandra Klineburger appealed a code enforcement order. The county hearing examiner affirmed the order, concluding that the County did not have the authority to disturb Ecology’s determination that the Klineburgers’ property did not qualify for an exception to state regulations prohibiting construction in a designated floodway. The superior…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Marley v. Department of Labor & IndustriesWashington Supreme Court · 1994
- King County v. Washington State Boundary Review BoardWashington Supreme Court · 1993
- Durland v. San Juan CountyWashington Supreme Court · 2014
- Samuel's Furniture, Inc. v. Department of EcologyWashington Supreme Court · 2002
- PHOENIX DEVELOPMENT, INC. v. City of WoodinvilleWashington Supreme Court · 2011
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Mike Hamilton, V Pollution Control Hrgs BdCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2018
- Fall City Sustainable Growth, V. King CountyCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2025
- Ladder Properties Llc, Et Ano V. City Of SnoqualmieCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2026
- Sandra & Stephen Klineburger, Appellant's v. King County Dept Of PermittingCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2021
- Simon's Way Development, Inc v. Clark CountyCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2021
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.