Legal Opinion

In Re Isadore

Washington Supreme Court

Decided April 22, 2004No. 72929-8PublishedCited by 147 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

88 P.3d 390 (2004)

151 Wash.2d 294

In the Matter of the Personal Restraint Petition Of Roy Lee ISADORE, Petitioner.

No. 72929-8.

Supreme Court of Washington, En Banc.

Argued February 10, 2004.

Decided April 22, 2004.

Roy L. Isadore, in pro per.

Pattie Mhoon, Tacoma, for Petitioner.

Russell Hauge, Kitsap County Prosecutor, Randall Sutton, Deputy, Port Orchard, for Respondent.

IRELAND, J.

In this case we determine whether a defendant who was misinformed of a direct consequence of a guilty plea is required to show the materiality of that consequence to his decision to plead guilty in order to be entitled…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Boykin v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  2. In Re the Personal Restraint of CookWashington Supreme Court · 1990
  3. In re the Personal Restraint of IsadoreWashington Supreme Court · 2004
  4. Matter of Personal Restraint of CashawWashington Supreme Court · 1994
  5. State v. WalshWashington Supreme Court · 2001

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by147 opinions

  1. In re the Personal Restraint of CoatsWashington Supreme Court · 2011
  2. In Re HintonWashington Supreme Court · 2004
  3. In re the Personal Restraint of HintonWashington Supreme Court · 2004
  4. State v. ANJWashington Supreme Court · 2010
  5. State v. A.N.J.Washington Supreme Court · 2010

142 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API