Legal Opinion

Town of Woodway v. Snohomish County

Washington Supreme Court

Decided April 10, 2014No. 88405-6PublishedCited by 28 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtOwens, J.

¶1 In Washington, developers have a vested right to have their development proposals processed under land use plans and development regulations in effect at the time a complete permit application is filed. In this case, we are asked whether our vested rights doctrine applies to permit applications filed under plans and regulations that were later found to be noncompliant with the State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA), chapter 43.21C RCW. We hold that it does. Local land use plans and development regulations enacted under the Growth Management Act (GMA), chapter 36.70A RCW, are presumed valid…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. Klem v. Washington Mutual BankWashington Supreme Court · 2013
  2. Skagit Surveyors v. FRIENDS OF SKAGITWashington Supreme Court · 1998
  3. Skagit Surveyors & Engineers, LLC v. Friends of Skagit CountyWashington Supreme Court · 1998
  4. Duke v. BoydWashington Supreme Court · 1997
  5. Duke v. BoydWashington Supreme Court · 1997

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by28 opinions

  1. Whatcom County v. Western Washington Growth Management Hearings BoardWashington Supreme Court · 2016
  2. Miotke v. Spokane CountyCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2014
  3. Snohomish County v. Pollution Control Hearings BoardWashington Supreme Court · 2016
  4. Potala Village Kirkland, LLC v. City of KirklandCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2014
  5. Whatcom County v. Western Washington Growth Management Hearings BoardCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2015

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API