Legal Opinion

In re the Personal Restraint of Isadore

Washington Supreme Court

Decided April 22, 2004No. 72929-8PublishedCited by 149 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtIreland, J.

In this case we determine whether a defendant who was misinformed of a direct consequence of a guilty plea is required to show the materiality of that consequence to his decision to plead guilty in order to be entitled to a remedy for an involuntary plea. We hold that a defendant who is misinformed of a direct consequence of his guilty plea need not make a special showing of materiality in order to be afforded a remedy for an involuntary plea.

FACTS

On March 21, 2000, Isadore pleaded guilty to second degree burglary and third degree assault. The prosecutor and defense counsel were unaware that,…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Boykin v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  2. In Re the Personal Restraint of CookWashington Supreme Court · 1990
  3. Matter of Personal Restraint of CashawWashington Supreme Court · 1994
  4. State v. WalshWashington Supreme Court · 2001
  5. State v. MillerWashington Supreme Court · 1988

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by149 opinions

  1. In re the Personal Restraint of CoatsWashington Supreme Court · 2011
  2. In Re IsadoreWashington Supreme Court · 2004
  3. In Re HintonWashington Supreme Court · 2004
  4. In re the Personal Restraint of HintonWashington Supreme Court · 2004
  5. State v. ANJWashington Supreme Court · 2010

144 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API