Legal Opinion

United States v. Certain Parcels of Land Situate

District Court, S.D. California

Decided August 1, 1949No. Civ. 5712PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

J. F. T. O’CONNOR, District Judge.

Introductory Statement: The United States Government has filed a complaint in condemnation under the authority of the Act of Congress approved February 26, 1931, 46 Stat. 1421, 40 U.S.C.A. 258a; the Acts of Congress approved June 17, 1902, 32 Stat. 388; August 30, 1935, 49 Stat. 1028; July 3, 1945, Public Law, 123, 79th Congress, 1st Session, 59 Stat. 318; and Acts amendatory thereof or supplementary thereto, seeking the condemnation of, and the fee simple title to, the following parcels of land:

Parcel 1-28-11

The Northwest Quarter of the Northwest Quarter…

2Cases cited69 opinions

  1. Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  2. Smellie v. Southern Pacific Co.California Supreme Court · 1931
  3. Williamson v. . BrownNew York Court of Appeals · 1857
  4. Lady Washington Consolidated Co. v. WoodCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896
  5. Mattingly v. PennieCalifornia Supreme Court · 1895

64 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Hatcher v. HallMissouri Court of Appeals · 1956
  2. Wynn v. Treasure Co.California Court of Appeal · 1956
  3. Horton v. KyburzCalifornia Supreme Court · 1959
  4. Bennerson v. SmallCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1988
  5. General Factors, Inc. v. BeckArizona Supreme Court · 1965

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API