Legal Opinion

Horton v. Kyburz

California Supreme Court

Decided November 17, 1959No. Sac. 7006PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSchauer, J.

In this action to have defendant declared the constructive trustee for plaintiff of an undivided one half interest in real property, plaintiff appeals from a judgment which decrees that he has no interest in such property. Plaintiff alleged and the trial court found facts sufficient to raise a constructive trust under the view of Notten v. Mensing (1935), 3 Cal.2d 469, 473-477 [1-6] [45 P.2d 198], and Ryan v. Welte (1948), 87 Cal.App.2d 897, 901-903 [4-6] [198 P.2d 357]; i.e., plaintiff’s father and stepmother orally agreed that all their property would go to the survivor for life and that…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Buckley v. ChadwickCalifornia Supreme Court · 1955
  2. Notten v. MensingCalifornia Supreme Court · 1935
  3. McClure v. DonovanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1949
  4. Johndrow v. ThomasCalifornia Supreme Court · 1947
  5. Orella v. JohnsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1952

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Bank of California v. ConnollyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1973
  2. Melendrez v. D & I INVESTMENT, INC.California Court of Appeal · 2005
  3. Lewis v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1994
  4. Trengen v. MongeonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1973
  5. Schmidt v. BeckelmanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1960

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API