Legal Opinion
Vargas v. Meese
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided October 13, 1987No. Civ. A. No. 87-2641-OGPublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM
GASCH, District Judge.
Plaintiffs have moved the Court that this case be maintained as a class action, pursuant to Rules 23(a) and 23(b)(2) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, on behalf of themselves and a class consisting of: all persons who entered the United States on “H-2” and/or “H-2A” temporary work visas on or after June 26,1987 to work in the Virginia tobacco harvest, and who seek to file applications for adjustment of status under section 210 of the Immigration and Naturalization Act (the “Special Agricultural Worker” or “SAW” program).
Plaintiffs are Mexican citizens…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Califano v. YamasakiSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- United States v. LarionoffSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Sorenson v. Secretary of the TreasurySupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Nicholas J. Larionoff, Jr. v. The United States of America, Nicholas J. Larionoff, Jr. v. The United States of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1976
- Appleyard v. WallaceCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1985
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Liberty Lincoln Mercury, Inc. v. Ford Marketing Corp.District Court, D. New Jersey · 1993
- Bynum v. District of ColumbiaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2003
- Livengood Feeds, Inc. v. KgaaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2002
- Barnes v. District of ColumbiaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2007
- Meijer, Inc. v. Warner Chilcott Holdings Co. III, Ltd.District Court, District of Columbia · 2007
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.