Legal Opinion

Bynum v. District of Columbia

District Court, District of Columbia

Decided March 31, 2003No. Civ.A. No. 02-956 RCLPublishedCited by 72 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION

LAMBERTH, District Judge.

This matter comes before the Court on plaintiffs’ motion for class certification [6-1], which was filed on July 26, 2002, and defendant’s motion for an enlargement of time to file a brief in opposition to the “strip search” component of plaintiffs’ motion [41-2], Upon consideration of the parties’ motions, the opposition and reply briefs filed thereto, and the applicable law in this case, the Court finds that plaintiffs’ motion should be granted in part and denied in part, and that defendant’s motion should be denied.

I. BACKGROUND

This action arises…

2Cases cited40 opinions

  1. Amchem Products, Inc. v. WindsorSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
  2. Eisen v. Carlisle & JacquelinSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  3. General Telephone Co. of the Northwest, Inc. v. Equal Employment Opportunity CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  4. Allison v. Citgo Petroleum Corp.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1998
  5. Honorable Ronald v. Dellums v. James M. Powell, Chief, United States Capitol Police, Jerry v. Wilson, Chief, Metropolitan Police DepartmentCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1977

35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by72 opinions

  1. Ford v. ChartOne, Inc.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2006
  2. Damus v. NielsenCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2018
  3. Radosti v. Envision Emi, LLCDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2010
  4. Barnes v. District of ColumbiaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2007
  5. Cohen v. Warner Chilcott Public Ltd.District Court, District of Columbia · 2007

67 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API