Sorenson v. Secretary of the Treasury
Supreme Court of the United States
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Blackmun
The Internal Revenue Code and the Social Security Act direct the Secretary of the Treasury to “intercept” certain *853tax refunds payable to persons who have failed to meet child-support obligations. In this case, the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit ruled that payments involving eamed-income credits could be intercepted. 752 F. 2d 1433 (1985). We granted certiorari, 472 U. S. 1016 (1985), because this ruling was in conflict with decisions of the Courts of Appeals for the Second and Tenth Circuits. See Rucker v. Secretary of Treasury, 751 F. 2d 351 (CA10 1984); Nelson v.…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Atlantic Cleaners & Dyers, Inc. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
- Helvering v. Stockholms Enskilda BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
- Sorenson v. Secretary of the Treasury of the United StatesDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 1982
- Nelson v. ReganCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1984
3Cited by346 opinions
- United Sav. Assn. of Tex. v. Timbers of Inwood Forest Associates, Ltd.Supreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Barnhart v. WaltonSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
- Reves v. Ernst & YoungSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Law v. SiegelSupreme Court of the United States · 2014
- Estate of Cowart v. Nicklos Drilling Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1992
341 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.