Legal Opinion
United States v. Larionoff
Supreme Court of the United States
Decided June 13, 1977No. 76-413PublishedCited by 788 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Brennan
Seven enlisted members of the United States Navy brought this class action in the District Court for the District of Columbia under the Tucker Act, 28 U. S. C. § 1346 (a)(2), alleging that their agreements to extend their enlistments, made at various times from 1968 to 1970, entitled each of them to payment of a re-enlistment bonus. The District Court ordered that the bonuses be paid, 365 F. Supp. 140 (1973), and the Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit affirmed. 175 U. S. App. D. C. 32, 533 F. 2d 1167 (1976). We granted certiorari, 429 U. S. 997 (1976). We affirm.
I
From early…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Ernst & Ernst v. HochfelderSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Lynch v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
- Manhattan General Equipment Co. v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueSupreme Court of the United States · 1936
- Dixon v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- Perry v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by788 opinions
- Stinson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Kisor v. WilkieSupreme Court of the United States · 2019
- McCarty v. McCartySupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Monsour Medical Center v. HecklerCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1986
- Lyng v. PayneSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
783 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.