Legal Opinion

Livengood Feeds, Inc. v. Kgaa

District Court, District of Columbia

Decided February 25, 2002No. MDL 1285; MISC. No. 99-197(TFH)PublishedCited by 72 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Re: Motions for Class Certification

THOMAS F. HOGAN, Chief Judge.

Pending before the Court are two motions for class certification: Plaintiffs’ Motion for Certification of a Vitamin Products Class and Plaintiffs’ Motion for Certification of a Choline Chloride Class. Upon careful consideration of Plaintiffs’ Joint Memorandum of Law in Support of Plaintiffs’ Motions for Class Certification (“Pls.Mem.”); Defendants Merck KgaA, Merck and EM Industries, Inc.’s Memorandum of Law in Opposition to *254Plaintiffs’ Motion for Certification of a Bulk Vitamins Product Class (“Merck Mem.”);…

2Cases cited56 opinions

  1. Amchem Products, Inc. v. WindsorSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
  2. General Telephone Co. of Southwest v. FalconSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  3. Eisen v. Carlisle & JacquelinSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  4. Coopers & Lybrand v. LivesaySupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  5. Illinois Brick Co. v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1977

51 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by72 opinions

  1. Bynum v. District of ColumbiaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2003
  2. Ford v. ChartOne, Inc.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2006
  3. Barnes v. District of ColumbiaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2007
  4. Cohen v. Warner Chilcott Public Ltd.District Court, District of Columbia · 2007
  5. Taylor v. District of Columbia Water & Sewer AuthorityDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2007

67 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API