Legal Opinion

Abbott Laboratories v. Thermo Chem, Inc.

District Court, W.D. Michigan

Decided August 20, 1991No. 1:89-CV-994PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

ROBERT HOLMES BELL, District Judge.

Plaintiffs filed this action to recover response costs from defendants pursuant to the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act (“CERCLA”), 42 U.S.C. § 9601 et seq. The parties have filed cross-motions for partial summary judgment. Plaintiffs seek an order adjudicating defendants jointly and severally liable for contribution for all response costs incurred or which may be incurred at the Thermo Chem NPL site in Muskegon, Michigan. Defendants seek an order striking plaintiffs’ request for attorney fees.

Facts

Thomas Solvent…

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. Hensley v. EckerhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  5. Alyeska Pipeline Service Co. v. Wilderness SocietySupreme Court of the United States · 1975

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Superior Consulting Co. v. WallingDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 1994
  2. Heywood v. Department of CommerceCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2017
  3. Franklin County Convention Facilities Authority v. American Premier Underwriters, Inc.District Court, S.D. Ohio · 1999
  4. Hastings Building Products, Inc. v. National Aluminum Corp.District Court, W.D. Michigan · 1993
  5. Suntrust Bank v. Blue Water Fiber Ltd. PartnershipDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2000

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API