Legal Opinion

Superior Consulting Co. v. Walling

District Court, E.D. Michigan

Decided April 28, 1994No. 94-71091PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION

McKEAGUE, District Judge.

This is a private remediation cost recovery action under CERCLA, the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act, 42 U.S.C. §§ 9601 et seq. Plaintiff Pierson Sand & Gravel, Inc. (“Pier-son Sand”), alleges it has incurred expenses in excess of $5.2 million in removing hazardous wastes from, and remediating their effects at, a site owned by it in Pierson Township, Montcalm County, Michigan. Pierson Sand alleges the hazardous substances were deposited there prior to its purchase of the site in 1984. Included among those named as…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. Raska v. Farm Bureau Mutual InsuranceMichigan Supreme Court · 1982
  5. B.F. Goodrich Co. v. MurthaCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1992

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Radiant Global Logistics, Inc. v. FurstenauDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2019
  2. Superior Consulting Co., Inc. v. WallingDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 1994
  3. Acrisure LLC, et al. v. John JacobiDistrict Court, W.D. Michigan · 2026
  4. BORGWARNER PDS (ANDERSON), L.L.C., a Delaware limited liability company v. INDUSTRIAL MOLDING CORPORATION, a Tennessee corporationDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2020
  5. CPM Acquisition Corp. v. EasterdayDistrict Court, W.D. Michigan · 2024

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API