Legal Opinion
Hastings Building Products, Inc. v. National Aluminum Corp.
District Court, W.D. Michigan
Decided March 4, 1993No. 1:88:CV:619PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
ENSLEN, District Judge.
This matter is before the Court pursuant to plaintiffs motion to award attorneys’ fees. The case arose out of the contamination of soil and groundwater in the vicinity of the Hastings Building Products plant in Hastings, Michigan. Defendant owned the plant when the underground storage tanks in question were installed in 1978. Plaintiff acquired the plant, and the leaking tanks, in 1986.
The case went to trial on September 20, 1990. During trial, the Court granted a directed verdict in favor of defendant on plaintiffs three state law claims. After the trial…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Runyon v. McCrarySupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Diane Colby, on Her Own Behalf and That of All Other Persons Similarly Situated v. J.C. Penney Company, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1987
- General Electric Company v. Litton Industrial Automation Systems, Inc. And Litton Industries, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1990
- United States v. MottoloDistrict Court, D. New Hampshire · 1985
- T & E INDUSTRIES, INC. v. Safety Light Corp.District Court, D. New Jersey · 1988
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- American Silicon Technologies v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2001
- Farm Bureau Mutual Insurance v. Porter & Heckman, Inc.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1997
- Kelly v. WehrumDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 1997
- American Silicon Technologies v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2001