Legal Opinion
Heywood v. Department of Commerce
Court of Appeals of Utah
Decided December 21, 2017No. 20160289-CAPublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HAGEN, Judge:
¶1 In 2006, a bankruptcy court found that Austin G. Heywood Jr., a real estate agent, committed fraud by concealing a bona fide purchase offer from his client so that he could force a short sale of the property to his own investment group (the 2006 transaction). Several years later, in November 2014, Heywood submitted an application to the Utah Department of Commerce, Division of Real Estate (the Division) to renew his license as a real estate sales agent. In light of the bankruptcy court's finding, the Division found that Heywood did not demonstrate the "honesty, integrity,…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Utah Power & Light Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1917
- Olga Zdanok v. The Glidden Company, Durkee Famous Foods Division, Frank T. Alexander v. The Glidden Company, Durkee Famous Foods DivisionCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1964
- Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 98,777, 11 Fed. R. Evid. Serv. 781 Chemetron Corporation, Cross-Appellant v. Business Funds, Inc., Cross-AppelleesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1982
- Glidden Co. v. Lumbermens Mutual Casualty Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 2006
- Ossman v. Diana Corp.District Court, D. Minnesota · 1993
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- GeoMetWatch v. Durham Jones PinegarCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2026
- Parkinson v. GillDistrict Court, D. Utah · 2019
- Peerless Idemnity Insurance Company v. BrennanDistrict Court, D. Utah · 2021
- Truman v. Orem CityDistrict Court, D. Utah · 2022
- Wardley v. McLachlanDistrict Court, D. Utah · 2021