Legal Opinion

Alyeska Pipeline Service Co. v. Wilderness Society

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided May 12, 1975No. 73-1977PublishedCited by 4,534 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice White

This litigation was initiated by respondents Wilderness Society, Environmental Defense Fund, Inc., and Friends of the Earth in an attempt to prevent the issuance of permits by the Secretary of the Interior which were required for the construction of the trans-Alaska oil pipeline. The Court of Appeals awarded attorneys’ fees to respondents against petitioner Alyeska Pipeline Service Co. based upon the court’s equitable powers and the theory that respondents were entitled to fees because they were performing the services of a “private attorney general.” Certiorari was granted, 419 U. S. 823…

2Cases cited55 opinions

  1. Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  2. Edelman v. JordanSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  3. Hanna v. PlumerSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  4. Bradley v. School Bd. of RichmondSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  5. Mills v. Electric Auto-Lite Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970

50 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4,534 opinions

  1. Hensley v. EckerhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. Blum v. StensonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  3. Chambers v. Nasco, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1991
  4. Cooter & Gell v. Hartmarx Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1990
  5. Ernst & Ernst v. HochfelderSupreme Court of the United States · 1976

4,529 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API